Behind the Arbitration: How Masin Deconstructed a $133M Construction Dispute
How Masin Deconstructed a $133M Construction Dispute
This case study showcases how Masin unraveled a $133M construction dispute through detailed delay, quantum, and technical analysis turning complex project data into clear, defensible insights during arbitration.
- Learn how expert forensic insights can strengthen your case and bring clarity to complex project delays.
- See how data-driven evidence can turn technical challenges into strategic advantages in arbitration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Get answers to frequently asked questions about everything we do.
What was the dispute about?
The case involved a $133 million arbitration between a luxury real estate developer and an international contractor over significant project delays and cost overruns.
Why do disputes arise over retention money?
Masin provided an independent delay, quantum, and technical analysis to determine the true causes of project delays and support the arbitration process.
What methodology did Masin use?
Masin employed the As-Planned vs. As-Built Window Analysis to reconstruct the project timeline and identify responsibility for delays.
What were the key findings?
Masin found that most delays were due to contractor inefficiencies, design approval lags, and material procurement issues.
How did Masin’s work benefit the client?
The Developer gained a strong, evidence-backed case with clear accountability, validated costs, and a forensic narrative that strengthened their arbitration position.